The use of Data Extraction Devices (DEDs) by the Michigan State Police (MSP) is under question as to its lawful use. This particular device is capable of extracting all cell phone information. These could include contact lists, photos, and yes, even those deleted messages. The American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU) is asking for clarification of how these devices are used.
It is known that DEDs are manufactured by CelleBrite. The company said that among its clientele are Verizon, Sprint, AT&T and some other major carriers. Specifically, the equipment is used to transfer data when a phone is upgraded. It has also said on its website how powerful the device is. Once plugged in, it can retrieve even deleted and hidden data, and can capture contact lists, images and text messages.
Critics are not opposed to the nature and purpose of the devices, but by their use in law enforcement. The concerned groups are not sure whether the devices are lawfully used. The ACLU doubts that there is no privacy violation involved among some people that are searched. For some time, it has been urging the MSP to give details how the devices are being used. The ACLU also suspects that the tools are being used unlawfully just to obtain information from random people.
In response, the Michigan State Police denied allegations that it is secretly mining out mobile data during traffic stops. In a statement, it outlined how enforcers are going to use the devices. Before using the DED, the officer must either hold a search warrant or obtain consent from the holder of the mobile device. Furthermore, the device cannot be used by just any police officer, but by a specialty team on criminal cases, such as crime against children.
The use of DEDs by the police was in reaction to the continuing rise of crimes using mobile communication devices. The proper use of DEDs can extract crucial information from criminals. These are some of the explanations given by the MSP as to why it decided to buy and use these kinds of devices.
A government official said that there should be well-defined limits as to the lawful use of the devices. However, according to him, cell phones that are involved in the commission of crimes should be beyond these limits. This implies that recognized criminals should not have the same privilege of privacy as those law-abiding citizens.
Concerned about privacy? It’s not just phone privacy you should worry about. You should also worry about your Internet privacy and use an anonymous proxy to defend it.